The purpose of this study is to find out the possibility and limitations of the candidate for the KCI listing in the eSports Studies. First, it is the possibility of a candidate. Evaluation is based on eligibility for application, system evaluation and content evaluation. 1) The criteria for regularity of publication, the number of judges per paper, research ethics, diversity of thesis contributions, and establishment of a basic academic journal system. Pass is expected. 2) Out of 30 points in the system evaluation (quantitative quantity), students should get at least 21 points, or 70 percent. It can be evaluated as the number of academic journals published (4/4) per year, online accessibility of journals and articles (including KCI registration) (13/13), thesis publishing rate (5/5), stability of the editorial chair (4/4), and citation index (2/4). 3) It is a content evaluation (precision). You have to score 49 out of 70. Academic value and performance of published papers (18/20), professionalism of editorial committees (13/15), completeness and readability of the paper collection (10/10), quality of thesis abstracts (5/5), academic value of research ethics enhancement activities (4/5), and academic specificity (2/3) Second, the limitations include negative views on e-sports, a lack of contribution papers, a short history of academics, and a lack of professional researchers.